BJRD recognises that artificial intelligence tools may support limited scholarly and editorial tasks, but their use must be transparent, responsible, ethical, and accountable.
General Principle
The Bhutan Journal of Research and Development (BJRD) recognises that artificial intelligence, including generative AI tools, may assist with limited tasks such as language editing, transcription, translation, coding, formatting, data visualisation, or other forms of technical support.
Such use must be responsible, transparent, and must not compromise originality, accuracy, confidentiality, authorship, research ethics, or the integrity of the scholarly record.
Disclosure Requirements
Authors must disclose the use of AI tools where such tools materially contributed to writing, analysis, coding, image generation, data processing, translation, or other manuscript preparation. The disclosure must identify the tool used, the purpose of use, and the extent of use.
Routine spelling, grammar, or reference-formatting assistance does not need to be disclosed unless it materially affects the scholarly content, interpretation, analysis, or presentation of the manuscript.
Suggested disclosure statement:
“The authors used [tool name] for [purpose, e.g., language editing, coding support, translation, or data visualisation]. The authors reviewed and verified all content and remain fully responsible for the accuracy, originality, and integrity of the manuscript.”
If no generative AI tool was used, authors may state:
“No generative AI tools were used in the preparation of this manuscript.”
Author Accountability
Authors are fully responsible for verifying all facts, citations, data, analysis, interpretation, quotations, permissions, images, references, and claims included in the manuscript. AI-generated references, quotations, data, images, or claims must not be included unless they have been independently verified and properly disclosed where relevant.
Authors are also responsible for ensuring that AI-assisted content does not result in plagiarism, fabrication, falsification, misleading interpretation, copyright infringement, breach of confidentiality, or violation of research ethics.
Prohibited Uses
BJRD does not permit the use of AI tools for:
- fabricating or falsifying data, evidence, images, citations, sources, references, or findings;
- creating misleading, manipulated, or deceptive images, tables, figures, or text;
- generating fake reviewer identities or manipulating the peer-review process;
- misrepresenting authorship, contribution, originality, or accountability;
- submitting AI-generated text as original scholarly work without appropriate human verification and disclosure;
- creating false quotations, unverifiable sources, or inaccurate bibliographic details;
- concealing plagiarism, duplicate publication, or text recycling; or
- uploading confidential manuscript, peer-review, editorial, or participant material into public or unsecured AI systems without permission.
Use of AI by Reviewers and Editors
Reviewers and editors must not upload confidential manuscripts, review reports, decision letters, editorial correspondence, unpublished data, tables, figures, or supplementary materials into public AI tools or third-party systems that may store, reuse, or expose the content.
AI tools must not replace expert scholarly judgement. Reviewers and editors remain responsible for their own assessments, recommendations, decisions, and communications.
Confidentiality and Data Protection
All submitted manuscripts, peer-review materials, editorial correspondence, author identities during double-blind review, reviewer identities, complaints, appeals, and misconduct investigations are confidential.
Any use of AI tools must preserve confidentiality, data security, intellectual property rights, participant privacy, and journal integrity. Where confidentiality, data security, or ownership cannot be assured, AI tools must not be used.